Crypto Crash 2026: Senator Elizabeth Warren Warns Against Using Taxpayer Funds to Bail Out Crypto Billionaires

Executive Summary When severe volatility strikes the cryptocurrency markets, a critical question emerges: who is truly driving the market movements, and who will bear the ultimate cost? For years, a significant debate has persisted regarding whether digital assets are genuinely independent financial instruments or if the industry will inevitably look to Washington, D.C., for a safety net when market conditions deteriorate. Today, that conversation has reached a boiling point. Amidst a massive market downturn that has erased billions in value, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has issued a harsh warning to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, demanding they rule out any “backdoor rescue” for the crypto industry and its wealthiest investors.

Here is a deep dive into the recent crypto crash, the cascading liquidations amplifying the crisis, and why regulators are being pressured to protect American taxpayers from footing the bill for billionaire losses.

The 2026 Crypto Market Crash: From Peak to Plummet

To understand the urgency of Senator Warren’s warning, it is essential to look at the severe price volatility currently rocking the digital asset space. At its peak in October, Bitcoin traded at staggering highs above $125,000. However, the broader market has since experienced a fierce downturn, drastically trimming the paper value of major portfolios.

By mid-February 2026, Bitcoin’s value had plummeted. The cryptocurrency has recently hovered near the mid-$60,000 range, as market volatility cooled slightly following a major capitulation event on February 5. Extending its monthly decline to nearly 29%, Bitcoin was recently trading at $65,906. This dramatic fall from grace has triggered severe consequences across the market, especially for investors and firms relying on borrowed capital to fund their operations.

The Leverage Problem and Cascading Liquidations

Senator Warren specifically highlighted the mechanics behind the crash, noting that the massive selloff “has been amplified by cascading liquidations of leveraged positions”. When crypto investors borrow funds to increase their exposure (leverage), a sudden drop in price can force automatic sell-offs (liquidations) to cover the debt, which in turn drives the price down even further.

The numbers reflect the severity of this cycle. During the early February drawdown, more than $2 billion in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated as Bitcoin briefly slid below the $61,000 mark. Liquidity in the market remains highly fragile, and large-scale liquidations continue to occur.

Even highly connected and well-capitalized entities have been forced into defensive maneuvers. As a prime example of this extreme leverage pressure, Senator Warren pointed to the activity of World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture with ties to President Donald Trump. As Bitcoin’s price dropped below $63,000, World Liberty Financial was forced to sell approximately 173 wrapped Bitcoin to repay $11.75 million in USDC stablecoin debt. This emergency transaction was executed specifically to avoid forced liquidation, demonstrating that even well-connected crypto firms are scrambling to shore up their positions as prices fall.

Treasury Secretary’s Deflection Sparks Speculation

The core of Senator Warren’s concern stems from recent congressional testimony that failed to provide clear boundaries on government intervention. In her letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Warren pointed directly to an exchange during Bessent’s appearance before the House Financial Services Committee.

During the hearing, Bessent was asked point-blank about his authority to bail out the cryptocurrency industry, and specifically whether “the money of our taxpayers … is … going to be deployed into crypto assets”.

Instead of issuing a definitive denial, Secretary Bessent deflected the question. According to Warren, rather than giving a simple “no,” Bessent responded by stating, “[w]e are retaining seized bitcoin”.

For Senator Warren, this lack of a clean, unequivocal denial is highly concerning because it actively invites market speculation about what the government might do next. She argued that “It’s deeply unclear what, if any, plans the U.S. government currently has to intervene in the current Bitcoin selloff”. Warren’s stance is that both the Treasury and the Federal Reserve possess powerful tools capable of supporting markets during a crisis, and she is demanding a clear, public commitment that these tools will absolutely not be utilized to cushion the blow for crypto investors.

Inside the U.S. Government’s $21.8 Billion Bitcoin Stash

Secretary Bessent’s comment about “retaining seized bitcoin” highlights a massive, often-overlooked factor in the digital asset landscape: the United States government is a crypto whale. According to onchain analytics firm Arkham, the U.S. government currently holds approximately 328,372 Bitcoin (BTC).

At current market levels near $66,400 per BTC, this vast portfolio is valued at roughly $21.8 billion. This stash was largely accumulated not through strategic investment, but through law enforcement seizures tied to massive criminal cases, including the infamous Silk Road marketplace and the Bitfinex exchange hack. These immense holdings make the U.S. government one of the largest known Bitcoin holders on the planet. However, just like private investors, the government has seen the value of these holdings drop significantly from their October peak.

Billionaires Suffer Massive Paper Losses

As the market bleeds, the most prominent figures in the cryptocurrency space are taking historic financial hits. Senator Warren emphasized that even the largest players in the industry are not insulated when Bitcoin drops hard.

In her letter, she outlined the catastrophic paper losses suffered by high-profile crypto billionaires as the asset’s value continues to plummet. Among the notable casualties:

• Michael Saylor: The CEO of MicroStrategy has seen the shares of his company, Strategy Inc., fall by nearly 20% since the beginning of the year.

• Changpeng Zhao: The founder of the Binance exchange has reportedly lost a staggering $30 billion due to the market downturn.

• Brian Armstrong: The head of Coinbase has reportedly suffered losses amounting to $7 billion.

While these numbers are eye-watering, Senator Warren’s central point is clear: large paper losses for prominent crypto figures do not, under any circumstances, justify government intervention. Turning the private losses of billionaires into a justification for taxpayer-funded support is precisely the outcome she wants federal regulators to vehemently reject.

Conflicts of Interest and the Final Warning

Beyond the economic arguments against bailing out a volatile, high-risk sector, Senator Warren also raised serious ethical and political concerns. She tied her warning directly to what she described as “politically connected crypto activity unfolding during the downturn”.

Specifically, Warren raised a major conflict of interest concern regarding the current administration. She argued that any government intervention to prop up the crypto markets could “directly enrich” President Donald Trump and his family, pointing directly to their well-documented connection to the World Liberty Financial venture.

In her final, uncompromising warning to the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, Senator Warren laid out her demands regarding the protection of public funds: “Your agencies must refrain from propping up Bitcoin and transferring wealth from taxpayers to crypto billionaires through direct purchases, guarantees, or liquidity facilities”.

Conclusion

The 2026 cryptocurrency crash has tested the limits of the digital asset market, resulting in billions of dollars in liquidations and historic losses for industry titans. As Bitcoin struggles to find stable footing after dropping from 125,000tothemid−60,000 range, the political battle over the future of these assets is heating up. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s proactive strike against the Treasury and Federal Reserve is a clear signal: the era of privatizing profits while socializing losses must not be extended to the cryptocurrency industry. Whether regulators will officially heed her warning and firmly shut the door on a “backdoor rescue” remains the trillion-dollar question hanging over the market.

——————————————————————————–

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why is Senator Elizabeth Warren warning the Treasury Department? Senator Warren is pressing the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve to rule out any “backdoor rescue” or bailout for cryptocurrency markets amid the recent severe market crash. She wants a clear commitment that taxpayer money will not be used to protect crypto billionaires from their massive paper losses.

How much has Bitcoin’s price dropped recently? Bitcoin has experienced a severe downturn, falling from a peak of over $125,000 in October to roughly $66,400, and was recently trading at $65,906. This represents a nearly 29% decline for the month.

What did Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent say about bailing out crypto? During a House Financial Services Committee hearing, Secretary Bessent was asked if taxpayer money would be deployed into crypto assets. Instead of giving a simple “no,” he deflected the question by stating, “We are retaining seized bitcoin”. Warren argues this lack of a clean denial invites market speculation.

How much Bitcoin does the U.S. government own? According to onchain analytics firm Arkham, the U.S. government is one of the largest Bitcoin holders globally, possessing approximately 328,372 BTC. At current market levels, this stash is worth about $21.8 billion. The government accumulated this Bitcoin largely through law enforcement seizures related to cases like the Silk Road and the Bitfinex hack.

What is a “cascading liquidation” in the crypto market? A cascading liquidation occurs when leveraged positions (investments made with borrowed money) are forced to sell off because the asset’s price drops below a certain threshold. This forced selling drives the price down further, triggering even more liquidations. In early February, more than $2 billion in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated as Bitcoin slid below $61,000.

Which crypto billionaires have lost money in this crash? Several headline names have taken massive hits. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao reportedly lost nearly $30 billion, while Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong reportedly lost $7 billion. Additionally, Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc. has seen its shares fall nearly 20% since the beginning of the year.

Why did Senator Warren mention Donald Trump in her letter? Senator Warren raised a conflict of interest concern, arguing that government intervention in the crypto market could “directly enrich” President Donald Trump and his family. This is due to their political connections to the crypto venture World Liberty Financial, which recently had to sell 173 wrapped Bitcoin to repay $11.75 million in debt to avoid liquidation.

Bitcoin Price Prediction 2026: Will BTC Hit $1 Million Following the Massive Crypto Market Crash?

The cryptocurrency landscape in early 2026 has proven to be a rollercoaster for investors and traders alike. Just a few short months after reaching euphoric new highs, the market is facing a severe reality check. Despite enduring one of the sharpest and most brutal drawdowns in recent memory, the conversation surrounding the world’s premier digital asset is far from overwhelmingly negative. In fact, some of the most prominent voices in the financial and political spheres are doubling down on their long-term bullish outlooks.

If you are wondering whether it is time to buy the dip or prepare for further losses, you are not alone. In this comprehensive, SEO-optimized guide, we will dive deep into the current state of Bitcoin, analyze the mechanical reasons behind the recent market crash, and explore why high-profile figures like Eric Trump are issuing a staggering Bitcoin price prediction of $1 million.

A Snapshot of the Bitcoin Price Today: Crashing From All-Time Highs

To understand where Bitcoin is heading, we first need to look at the raw numbers defining the current market. As of February 19, 2026, Bitcoin (BTC) opened the day at 66,420∗∗andreachedamodestintradayhighof∗∗66,930 before settling right around the $66,900 mark. This represented a very quiet and modest daily gain of just 0.74%.

However, this temporary quiet session masks a highly volatile and brutal recent history. The current price of roughly $66,900 means Bitcoin is trading at less than half of its staggering all-time high (ATH) of $126,198, which was set just four months prior in October 2025. Over this short period, BTC has shed nearly 47% of its total value.

The wider market metrics reflect this massive contraction. Bitcoin’s total market capitalization has dramatically dropped below the critical psychological threshold of 2trillion∗∗.AccordingtoCoinMarketCapdata,themarketcapcurrentlysitsatapproximately∗∗1.34 trillion, supported by a 24-hour trading volume of roughly $33.33 billion.

The slide in price rapidly accelerated when a previous structural channel collapsed. For the first two months of 2026, Bitcoin had been tightly oscillating in a consolidation range between $82,000 and $98,000. When that structure finally broke down, the asset plummeted to its lowest price levels since October 2024.

Technical Analysis: Are We Stuck in a Bearish Market?

From a technical analysis standpoint, the broader trend for Bitcoin right now remains firmly bearish. Following the collapse of the $82,000 to $98,000 support zone, the market has settled into a materially lower consolidation corridor.

Currently, Bitcoin is bounded by a strong support level at $60,000 on the downside, and a tough resistance zone clustered between $71,000 and $72,000 on the upside. For swing traders, this specific environment offers clear parameters: buying opportunities present themselves near tests of the $60,000 support, while selling opportunities arise during tests of the $70,000 to $72,000 resistance.

The bearish nature of the current market is further highlighted by major moving averages, which sit far above current price levels as a distant bearish overhang. The 50-period moving average (MA) is currently located at $79,000, while the critical 200-period Exponential Moving Average (EMA) sits even higher at $93,000. Analysts note that only a sustained recovery and a close above the $93,000 threshold would signal a genuine return to a bullish trend structure.

If the market fails to hold the current range and breaks convincingly below the 60,000floor,technicaldownsidetargetspointdirectlyto∗∗52,000**, which represents the previous market lows established in September 2024. Conversely, a breakout above $72,000 would demand close attention to see if the bull market is truly resuming or if the resistance ceiling has simply shifted higher.

Why Is Bitcoin Falling? The Mechanics of the February 2026 Crash

Understanding the fundamental drivers behind Bitcoin’s 47% drop requires looking at both derivatives markets and institutional ETF flows.

The immediate trigger for the massive slide was a violent deleveraging event that took place on February 6. This event wiped out billions of dollars in leveraged positions and sent implied volatility spiking. During a single week, open interest across major cryptocurrency exchanges contracted by approximately 22%. As a direct consequence, over $2.5 billion in speculative leveraged positions were forcefully liquidated. This purge of speculative excess pushed funding rates into negative territory for the first time since 2023.

Adam Saville Brown, Head of Commercial at Tesseract Group, warned that the subsequent retreat in volatility shouldn’t be mistaken for market stabilization. He described the current environment as “the mechanical aftermath of a significant deleveraging event, not a market that has found equilibrium”.

This mechanical selling has been heavily compounded by Spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which have flipped to net negative flows for the year 2026. Many fund-level allocators entered the market at an average cost basis of around $81,000. As the price tumbled, drawdown thresholds were triggered, forcing these allocators to mechanically de-risk and sell their holdings.

The Whale Counter-Narrative: Institutional Accumulation

While the ETF market is experiencing visible and predictable structural selling, a very different story is unfolding on-chain. Over the past two weeks, large wallets holding more than 1,000 BTC have been aggressively buying the dip, accumulating roughly 53,000 BTC. This represents an incredible $4 billion in capital deployment and marks the largest accumulation wave since November.

The macroeconomic backdrop is also providing a mixed but potentially supportive picture. On one hand, U.S. CPI has cooled to 2.4%, and the Federal Reserve is currently in a pause mode, which historically compresses real yields and supports risk assets like Bitcoin. On the other hand, uncertainty surrounding the incoming Fed chair has created a policy overhang that is stalling broader institutional decision-making.

Eric Trump’s Bold $1 Million Bitcoin Prediction

Against this backdrop of market carnage and widespread deleveraging, Eric Trump—son of US President Donald Trump and co-founder of World Liberty Financial—delivered a massive dose of optimism. During a February 18 interview on CNBC, Trump delivered one of the most emphatic public endorsements of the digital asset, declaring that he has “never been more bullish on Bitcoin” in his life.

He boldly predicted that Bitcoin will ultimately reach a staggering $1 million per coin. “I do think it hits a million dollars. I think it’s one of the greatest performing asset classes,” Trump stated, pointing out that just two years prior, Bitcoin was trading at a mere $16,000.

Trump anchored his lofty prediction in historical market data, noting that over the past decade, Bitcoin has generated a 70% average annual return. He challenged viewers to name any other asset class that has performed better year over year for the last ten years.

Furthermore, Trump pointed to the relentless wave of institutional adoption as the primary structural driver for future growth. He highlighted that traditional financial titans like Fidelity, Charles Schwab, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs are actively allocating cryptocurrency to their private wealth clients. “Before they were telling them to put exactly zero into cryptocurrency. Then it was 2 per cent, now all of a sudden it’s 5-6 per cent, and that number keeps on climbing,” he explained.

For investors worried about the current 47% drawdown, Trump’s message was blunt: “If you do not want volatility, go invest in some Munis, go have a great time, go invest in some Treasuries. You are going to have volatility with something that has tremendous upside”.

This sentiment was closely echoed by Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy. Speaking on the nature of Bitcoin’s massive swings, Saylor noted, “Volatility is the vitality of Bitcoin”. He argued that if Bitcoin offered steady and predictable returns, traditional investors like Warren Buffett would already own all of it, leaving no opportunity for the rest of the market.

Top Institutional Bitcoin Price Predictions for 2026

While Eric Trump envisions a long-term $1 million price tag, institutional analysts have laid out more measured, yet still highly bullish, targets for the remainder of 2026. It is worth noting that most of these forecasts were built before the deepest parts of the current crash, serving as useful anchors for a potential market recovery.

Here is a look at what top analysts are predicting for Bitcoin’s price:

• Bit Mining (Wei Yang, Chief Economist): $225,000 by the End of 2026.

• Nasdaq Analysis: $150,000 by the End of 2026.

• Bloomberg Intelligence (Eric Balchunas): A floor of $130,000 to $140,000 in 2026.

• Grayscale: A new all-time high expected by Mid-2026.

• World Liberty Financial (Eric Trump): $1,000,000 (Long-term).

The foundational bull case driving these numbers relies on three core pillars: an acceleration in institutional adoption, a pivot by the Federal Reserve that compresses real yields, and a structural supply squeeze driven by post-halving market dynamics alongside a resumption in ETF accumulation. Earlier in the year, Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas estimated that 2026 ETF inflows could range anywhere between $20 billion and $70 billion.

Conclusion: What Should Traders Watch Next?

The Bitcoin market is currently split down the middle. On one side, ETF allocators are mechanically de-risking as prices fall, while on the other, deep-pocketed “whales” are using the market dislocation to build massive structural positions.

Deribit is currently pricing BTC implied volatility at 52, which is elevated compared to the 12-month average, but still within the lower end of the historical 35-65 range. According to Paul Howard, Senior Director at Wincent, markets are not expecting an aggressive move higher or lower in the immediate near term, but are instead waiting for “clearer catalysts”.

With the leverage flush clearing the board and negative funding creating a crowded short base, the market is primed for a sharp reversal if macroeconomic uncertainty lifts. Until then, investors will be keeping a very close eye on the $60,000 support level.

——————————————————————————–

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is Bitcoin’s price today, February 19, 2026? Bitcoin is trading at approximately $66,900, up roughly 0.7% on the day. That remains nearly 47% below its all-time high of $126,198, which was set in October 2025.

Can Bitcoin really hit 1million?∗∗EricTrumpandotherlong−termadvocatesargueyes,citingBitcoin′smassivedecade−longaverageannualreturnof70.Mostinstitutionalforecastsfor2026,however,aresignificantlymoremeasured,rangingfrom∗∗130,000 to $225,000 by year-end.

What is the Bitcoin price prediction for the end of 2026? Analyst targets for the end of the year range from 130,000∗∗(Bloomberg)to∗∗225,000 (Bit Mining). Grayscale has also called for a new all-time high by mid-2026. These forecasts strongly assume that macroeconomic conditions will improve and that ETF flows will eventually return to positive territory.

What are the key Bitcoin support and resistance levels right now? Critical support currently sits at 60,000∗∗.Aconfirmedbreakdownbelowthisleveltargets∗∗52,000 (the September 2024 floor). Resistance is heavily clustered between $70,000 and $72,000. A recovery above the 200 EMA at $93,000 would be the first genuine signal that a new macro bull trend is underway

KAST Crypto Card Review: The Ultimate Stablecoin Debit Card for Global Spending

For years, cryptocurrency users have faced a significant hurdle: how to easily and efficiently spend their digital assets in the real world without navigating complex, high-fee off-ramps. The promise of decentralized finance is vast, but paying for a coffee or a grocery run with crypto has historically been plagued by friction. Enter KAST, a global money app powered by stablecoins that promises to deliver “Banking without the Bank” .

In this comprehensive, SEO-optimized review, we will dive deep into the KAST crypto card, exploring its core features, detailed pricing tiers, the impressive perks for Solana users, and real-world testimonials from actual customers who are utilizing this card around the globe. Whether you are looking for a simple virtual card for everyday purchases or a 37g Solid Gold luxury card, KAST is rapidly establishing itself as a premier off-ramp solution for Web3 enthusiasts.

——————————————————————————–

What is the KAST App and Crypto Card?

At its core, KAST is a financial platform designed to bridge the gap between your digital wallet and real-world spending. It provides users with global USD accounts and debit cards that are accepted at over 150 million merchants and ATMs worldwide .

The fundamental philosophy behind KAST is to allow users to free their money from bureaucratic borders . Available in more than 170 countries, KAST ensures that whether you are shopping in Dubai, living in Brazil, or sending funds to family in Mexico, your stablecoins remain secure and instantly accessible . Users can easily deposit cash, USDC, USDT, and various other cryptocurrencies into their accounts to fund their everyday lifestyles .

Key Features: Why KAST is Disrupting Traditional Banking

The KAST ecosystem is built on a few core pillars that elevate it above standard banking and typical crypto prepaid cards.

1. Seamless Off-Ramping and Instant Spending

One of the most praised aspects of the KAST app is how it eliminates the friction of traditional crypto off-ramping. A recent update to the platform allows users to deposit and swap assets like Solana (SOL), Ethereum (ETH), or Bitcoin (BTC) directly into USDC, allowing them to spend in real life instantly . As noted by users, KAST effectively acts as a direct crypto-to-payment solution where no fiat conversion step is actively needed by the user . You simply send stablecoins to your account, and you can spend them wherever you want with zero waiting time .

2. Massive Global Acceptance & Apple Pay Integration

KAST cards work virtually everywhere traditional credit cards are accepted. The ability to use stablecoins to pay at over 150 million stores and ATMs globally makes it a true powerhouse for travelers and digital nomads . Furthermore, the integration with modern payment systems is flawless. Users report being able to set up a virtual VISA Platinum card, top it up with crypto, and start paying for services like Deliveroo using Apple Pay within just five minutes .

3. Grow Your Wealth with Real-Time Rewards

Unlike traditional checking accounts that offer near-zero interest, KAST allows users to grow their assets. The platform offers a highly competitive 4.5% yield on deposits, featuring secure, real-time rewards . This means your money is constantly working for you, right up until the moment you swipe your card.

4. Bank-Grade Security & Exceptional Support

Security is paramount in the crypto space, and KAST delivers “Bank-Grade Security,” combining military-level protection with the inherent promises of stablecoin technology . Furthermore, if things do go wrong, their customer service team is highly responsive. One user highlighted that after experiencing an issue with a deposit, the KAST support team had it completely resolved within 10 minutes .

——————————————————————————–

Deep Dive: KAST Card Tiers, Pricing, and Exclusive Perks

KAST offers an impressive variety of card tiers tailored to everyone from casual crypto spenders to high-net-worth individuals seeking ultimate luxury. Across all tiers, users earn specific “KAST points” on their card spend (currently in “Season 5” of their rewards program) and receive unique point boosts based on staked SOL .

The Standard Tier (Free)

The Standard tier is perfect for everyday users who want instant access to stablecoin spending.

• Pricing: Free (users only pay for the shipping of the plastic card) .

• Card Options: 3 cards available, including the K Card, Solana Card, and Bitcoin Silver Card .

• Perks: Instant virtual card access to start spending immediately .

• Rewards: Earn 2% in reward points on all card spend during Season 5 .

• Crypto Boost: Earn a 0.25x KAST points boost on your staked SOL .

The Premium Tier ($1,000 / Year)

For those who want elevated living and heavier rewards, the Premium tier introduces metal cards and significantly higher cash-back points.

• Pricing: $1,000 per year .

• Card Options: 3 metal cards, including the X Card, the illuminating Solana Illuma Card, and the Bitcoin Black Card .

• Rewards: Earn a massive 5% in reward points on all card spend during Season 5 .

• Crypto Boost: Earn a 0.5x KAST points boost on staked SOL .

The Limited Tier ($5,000 One-Off Payment)

For users who despise annual fees but want premium perks, the Limited tier offers a lifetime solution.

• Pricing: A $5,000 one-off payment, with no annual fees forever .

• Card Options: 1 strictly-limited metal card known as the Founders Edition .

• Perks: Exclusive VIP Concierge access to the KAST senior team .

• Rewards: Earn 5% in reward points on card spend (Season 5) and a 0.5x KAST points boost on staked SOL .

The Luxe Tier (From $10,000 / Year to Invite-Only)

The Luxe tier is designed as the “ultimate flex” for high rollers in the Web3 space.

• Pricing: $10,000 per year for the standard Luxe option .

• Card Options: The stunning 24k Gold plated Solana Gold Card . The highest echelon is the Invite-Only Solana Solid Gold Card, which boasts 37g of Solid Gold and is marketed as the only one of its kind on the market .

• Perks: Luxe users receive VIP Concierge access, plus an additional gold-plated card for everyday use to keep their primary showpiece pristine .

• Rewards: A staggering 8% in reward points on all card spend during Season 5 .

• Crypto Boost: Earn a full 1x KAST points boost on staked SOL .

——————————————————————————–

The Solana Ecosystem Advantage

It is impossible to review KAST without highlighting its deep integration with the Solana blockchain. KAST has specifically tailored its product lineup to benefit Solana users, featuring dedicated “Solana x KAST” programming .

From the basic Solana Card to the 24k Gold plated and 37g Solid Gold Solana cards, the branding leans heavily into the SOL ecosystem . Beyond aesthetics, the platform actively rewards Solana holders. Every single card tier offers a multiplier boost on KAST points based directly on the user’s staked SOL, ranging from 0.25x at the Standard tier up to a 1x boost at the Luxe tier . Users report that sending Solana stables to the KAST app is an incredibly smooth experience, providing the most cost-effective and easiest way to off-ramp Solana and USDC into spendable fiat .

——————————————————————————–

Real User Testimonials: Does KAST Actually Work?

Marketing claims are one thing, but real-world utility is another. Based on extensive user feedback, KAST is surviving rigorous battle testing across the globe.

• Replacing the Traditional Bank: Multiple users have entirely replaced their traditional banking setups. Rahim Mahtab stated, “I haven’t touched my actual bank account since October !!! @KASTcard has been honestly one of my fav products in all of crypto” . Another user, Malikonchain, joked that their bank in Dubai actually called to check on them because they hadn’t used their traditional bank cards in three months, solely relying on KAST .

• Flawless Global Travel: A user named Kristel officially replaced her regular credit card with KAST after taking it on a 6-week journey through Toronto, Panama, Asunción, Fog de Iguazú, and Argentina, noting it was “battled tested and survived” . Similarly, a user named Pepper forgot their travel cards while visiting Vietnam, but found that KAST worked everywhere seamlessly, declaring that Satoshi’s vision of a peer-to-peer electronic cash system was coming to life .

• Everyday Purchases: It’s not just for international travel; it’s for groceries and takeout. JT Muralis reported a smooth experience using Solana stables at the local grocery store , while user KΞV completed 20 everyday transactions with their Virtual Solana KAST card, stating they are “beyond bullish on purchasing everyday items with stablecoins” .

• Ultimate Convenience: As user Lock experienced in Argentina, using KAST means “No banks. No swaps. Just tap & go. This is the future of payments” . Prominent developer Mert from Helius echoed this sentiment, calling KAST “super underrated” and “one of the most useful crypto products” because of the instant, off-ramp-free spending capability .

——————————————————————————–

Final Verdict: Is KAST the Best Crypto Debit Card?

If you are heavily invested in stablecoins or the Solana ecosystem, KAST represents an undeniable leap forward in Web3 financial utility. By seamlessly bridging the gap between digital assets and real-world merchants, it fulfills the core promise of cryptocurrency: true financial sovereignty.

With its diverse array of card tiers—ranging from a highly accessible free virtual card to ultra-premium 37g Solid Gold status symbols—KAST is catering to every demographic in the crypto space . Furthermore, features like 4.5% yield on deposits, up to 8% cash-back rewards, and instant Apple Pay compatibility make it a formidable competitor not just to other crypto cards, but to traditional banking institutions entirely .

For those who are tired of high off-ramp fees, waiting days for bank transfers, and dealing with bureaucratic banking borders, KAST proves itself as the step crypto and Web3 needed . As user 0xjay perfectly summarized, KAST is providing an off-ramp debit card that makes everyday purchases simple, fast, and ultimately limitless

Will Bitcoin Crash to $10,000? Bloomberg Analyst Warns of Crypto Bubble and Looming Recession

ntroduction The cryptocurrency market is no stranger to dramatic price swings, but a recent warning from a prominent financial analyst has sent shockwaves through the investing community. As investors continue to debate the long-term viability of digital assets, Mike McGlone, a senior commodity strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence, has issued a stark warning: Bitcoin (BTC) could plummet to $10,000. Furthermore, McGlone argues that the current downturn in the cryptocurrency market is not just an isolated event, but rather a warning sign that the “crypto bubble is imploding”.

According to his analysis, this implosion could serve as an early indicator of a looming U.S. recession. For investors who have grown accustomed to endless bull runs, this perspective suggests that a broader correction in U.S. stocks may be on the horizon, potentially signaling the end of the “buy the dip” optimism that has dominated markets for years. In this comprehensive article, we will explore the factors driving this bearish $10,000 Bitcoin price prediction, the correlation between crypto and traditional equities, the harsh criticisms from financial columnists, and why institutional adoption might still offer a glimmer of hope to counter the doom.

The Warning: Mike McGlone’s $10,000 Bitcoin Prediction When a senior strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence speaks, the financial world tends to listen. Mike McGlone has once again reiterated his base case scenario for Bitcoin, consistently claiming that the world’s largest cryptocurrency could face a catastrophic drop toward the $10,000 mark. Writing on LinkedIn, McGlone made his macroeconomic stance incredibly clear, stating that “collapsing Bitcoin/cryptos may guide the next recession”. He firmly believes that the rising volatility currently being witnessed across digital asset markets is not a self-contained phenomenon; instead, it possesses the distinct potential to “trickle up to stocks”.

This dire warning is rooted in the idea that Bitcoin’s performance is intimately tied to U.S. equities. Because Bitcoin possesses a notoriously high-risk profile, it operates as a highly sensitive gauge for overall market sentiment. If the stock market begins to turn lower and face significant bearish pressure, McGlone argues that Bitcoin will fundamentally struggle to hold its key support levels. The core concept here is that as investors begin to de-risk their portfolios in the face of economic uncertainty, highly speculative assets like cryptocurrencies are often the first to experience dramatic sell-offs.

The S&P 500 Connection: A Closer Look at the Numbers To understand how Bitcoin could potentially fall all the way to $10,000, it is essential to look at the mathematical correlations McGlone highlights between cryptocurrency and the traditional stock market. On February 13, McGlone observed a fascinating parity on his charts: when Bitcoin’s price was divided by 10, it was trading at roughly the exact same level as the S&P 500. At that specific time, both of these financial metrics were sitting just below the 7,000 mark.

Using this direct 10-to-1 correlation, McGlone projected potential future price movements. He noted that if the S&P 500 were to experience a decline toward the 5,600 level, this drop could correspond with Bitcoin’s price falling concurrently toward approximately $56,000. While a drop to $56,000 might seem like a standard, survivable market correction for seasoned crypto investors, McGlone’s forecast goes much further. He warned that if the broader stock market reaches a definitive peak and subsequently triggers a massive sell-off, it would likely set off a much deeper and more severe crypto correction. It is within this specific, worst-case economic scenario that Bitcoin would ultimately revisit the $10,000 price point.

Why a Crypto Crash Could Signal a U.S. Recession One of the most alarming aspects of McGlone’s analysis is the macroeconomic implication of a crypto market failure. Why exactly would a drop in digital currency prices trigger a national economic downturn? According to McGlone, a deep crypto selloff may actively “guide the next recession” because of how these assets function within the wider financial ecosystem.

He notes that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have increasingly traded like high-volatility “beta” assets. Because of this hyper-sensitivity to broader market conditions, cryptocurrencies serve as a potential early indicator of financial stress that can later spill over into more traditional sectors, such as stocks and credit markets.

McGlone points out that a strong “buy the dip” mindset has heavily supported financial markets ever since the devastating 2008 financial crisis. However, he suggests that this long-standing era of endless optimism may finally be coming to a bitter end. He identifies a toxic combination of factors that strongly resemble “late-cycle conditions” in the current economy, which include:

• Record-high U.S. equity valuations when measured relative to the nation’s GDP.

• Unusually subdued and low volatility currently seen in major stock indexes.

• A rapid shift in investor demand toward traditional safe-haven assets like gold and silver.

If the cryptocurrency market continues its downward slide while overall market volatility begins to actively rise, McGlone suggests it could rapidly accelerate a vicious “de-risking cycle”. Such a cycle would not just impact crypto day traders; it would cause widespread economic damage by hitting household wealth, cooling speculative investment, and souring corporate sentiment across the board.

The Bearish Narrative: Is Bitcoin’s Value Actually Zero? McGlone is not the only prominent voice expressing profound skepticism about the future of digital assets. His warnings are unfolding alongside a growing wave of bearish narratives currently making headlines across the financial world. Various market commentators are stepping forward to publicly question the fundamental thesis behind cryptocurrency investments.

A notable critic is Financial Times columnist Jemima Kelly, who recently appeared on CNBC to share a scathing review of the digital currency ecosystem. According to Kelly, Bitcoin’s true, intrinsic value is exactly “zero”. She fiercely argued that the asset possesses absolutely no underlying worth. One of the most popular bullish arguments for Bitcoin is its scarcity—specifically, the fact that its total supply is strictly capped at 21 million coins. However, Kelly claims that this scarcity narrative is completely undermined by the reality of the broader crypto market. She pointed out that investors are expected to continually accept the premise that Bitcoin is uniquely scarce, despite the glaring existence of countless competing tokens and altcoins existing alongside it.

Furthermore, Kelly criticized the tactics used by cryptocurrency advocates to maintain market enthusiasm. During her interview, she claimed that Bitcoin bulls frequently rely on introducing entirely new narratives to sustain investor interest. As a prime example of this tactic, she highlighted the recent market buzz surrounding artificial intelligence. She pointed to comments made by Anthony Pompliano on February 9, where he confidently told CNBC that “both Bitcoin and stablecoins” were destined to become the primary money “for all of these AI agents”. To critics like Kelly, these constantly shifting narratives are simply a smokescreen to distract from the asset’s lack of fundamental utility.

The Bullish Counterpart: Institutional Adoption Holds Strong Despite the severe warnings of a looming recession, predictions of a $10,000 price floor, and critics declaring the asset entirely worthless, there is a completely different side to the current cryptocurrency story. While critics continue to relentlessly question Bitcoin’s investment case, institutional adoption remains highly active and continues to expand globally.

Long-term support for the digital asset is noticeably growing among major corporate entities. Companies such as Strategy, Metaplanet, and MARA have not been deterred by the recent market volatility; instead, they have continued to actively add Bitcoin to their corporate balance sheets as a core component of their treasury strategies. This indicates a remarkably strong belief among certain institutional players that Bitcoin serves as a viable long-term store of value, completely independent of short-term price fluctuations.

Additionally, the historical price data paints a vivid picture of resilience. Despite major recent drawdowns and pullbacks in the market, Bitcoin is still up sharply over a five-year timeline. Looking closely at the numbers, Bitcoin’s price around February 17, 2021, was $49,207.28. Fast forward to February 17, 2026, and the current trading price sits at a highly positive $67,837.66. This represents a significant percentage gain of 37.86% over the five-year period, proving that long-term holders have still experienced substantial portfolio growth despite the turbulence.

JPMorgan’s Take: Bitcoin vs. Gold The expanding digital asset ecosystem is not just limited to corporate treasuries hoarding coins; traditional financial institutions are also deepening their involvement. Several major banks and global asset managers have continued to heavily expand their crypto-related services in recent years.

One of the most surprising endorsements of Bitcoin’s current market position comes from U.S. banking giant JPMorgan. In a recent analysis, JPMorgan announced that Bitcoin’s attractiveness relative to gold has actually improved, a fascinating development considering gold’s own recent market rally.

According to the analysts at JPMorgan, there has been a large outperformance of gold versus Bitcoin since last October. However, this outperformance has been coupled with a sharp and notable rise in gold’s overall volatility. Consequently, the JPMorgan analysts concluded that this specific market dynamic “has led to Bitcoin looking even more attractive compared to gold over the long term”. This perspective directly counters the bearish narratives pushed by critics, suggesting that in the ongoing competition for safe-haven asset dominance, Bitcoin is still very much a strong contender in the eyes of major institutional analysts.

Conclusion: Navigating the Crossroads of Crypto The current landscape of the cryptocurrency market presents a dramatic, highly polarized picture for investors. On one hand, you have respected financial experts like Bloomberg’s Mike McGlone warning that the “crypto bubble is imploding” and that a devastating crash to $10,000 could be the canary in the coal mine for a broader U.S. recession. Supported by late-cycle economic indicators and prominent critics like Jemima Kelly who argue Bitcoin’s true value is zero, the bearish case is built on a heavy foundation of macroeconomic fear and fundamental skepticism.

On the other hand, the reality of the market shows a completely different narrative actively playing out. Institutional adoption continues to surge as companies like MARA and Metaplanet buy up available supply, long-term investors are still sitting on a 37% gain over the last five years, and heavyweights like JPMorgan are boldly stating that Bitcoin looks more attractive than gold for the long haul.

As Bitcoin continues to trade around the $67,800 mark, the financial market stands at a critical crossroads. Whether the asset will succumb to the pressures of traditional stock market correlations and drag the global economy into a recession, or continue to defy the critics and establish itself as the ultimate digital store of value, remains to be seen. What is undeniably clear, however, is that the era of blind “buy the dip” optimism is being severely tested. Modern investors must now carefully weigh the stark warnings of an impending $10,000 crash against the undeniable momentum of growing institutional adoption.

Bitcoin’s Drop Below $70,000: A Critical Warning Sign for the Crypto Market

The cryptocurrency market is currently navigating a highly volatile and precarious environment, as the flagship digital asset, Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant downward pressure. Recently, Bitcoin losing the crucial $70,000 threshold has emerged as a stark warning sign for further potential downside. While traders and investors were initially optimistic about recent market movements, a confluence of technical breakdowns, shifting institutional flows, and overarching macroeconomic anxieties have dramatically altered the short-term outlook. As the crypto majors continue to soften and traders meticulously weigh the impact of everything from quantum computing fears to exchange-traded fund (ETF) flows, the broader trend for Bitcoin appears to be undergoing a fundamental shift. This comprehensive SEO-optimized analysis delves into the intricate details of Bitcoin’s recent price action, the underlying on-chain metrics, and the macroeconomic headwinds that are currently dictating market sentiment, providing you with the insights needed to navigate this uncertain terrain.

The Technical Landscape: Unpacking Bitcoin’s Critical Price Reversal

From a strictly technical analysis perspective, Bitcoin is demonstrating significant signs of weakness after definitively failing to sustain its gains above the pivotal $70,000 mark. Earlier in the week, the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization made a brief, concerted attempt to reclaim this critical level on Monday. However, this upward momentum was swiftly rejected as aggressive sellers emerged around the breakout zone, pushing the price down toward the $67,000 level. By early Wednesday, Bitcoin was trading near $68,000, which was roughly flat for the day but ominously sitting just underneath what had previously served as a reliable short-term support level. By Wednesday afternoon, the situation deteriorated further as Bitcoin fell back to $66,000, directly testing the lower boundaries of its recent trading range.

This shift in price dynamics is incredibly important for market participants to understand. Throughout the first half of February, the trading range between $68,000 and $70,000 had acted as a robust floor, providing a solid foundation for bullish sentiment. Losing this foundational floor substantially increases the risk that market rallies are now being viewed by traders as opportunities to sell, rather than opportunities to buy. The technical battle remains the absolute front-and-center issue for Bitcoin right now: if the asset can successfully reclaim $70,000, the bullish momentum could seamlessly reset. Conversely, a clean and sustained break under the $67,000 mark would immediately put lower support levels—specifically $65,000 and possibly even $60,000—squarely back into focus for traders. If the asset fails to hold its ground again, the market will likely begin pricing in a much deeper retracement. Alarmingly, Bitcoin is currently on track to record its fifth consecutive weekly decline, and firmly losing these current support levels could easily open the floor for a fresh leg lower in the broader market.

A Tale of Two Markets: Major Cryptos vs. Altcoin Resilience

While the mainstream focus remains largely on Bitcoin’s price prediction, the broader cryptocurrency market is currently exhibiting a fascinating divergence between large-cap majors and smaller-cap altcoins. Major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Binance Coin (BNB), have all experienced notable declines of as much as 3% over a seven-day period. In stark contrast, smaller tokens have recently displayed remarkable, perhaps unexpected, resilience. Assets such as Zcash (ZEC) and Cosmos (ATOM) have actively defied the broader market gravity, posting impressive gains of as much as 20% over the exact same past week.

However, industry experts strongly warn that this divergence may be extremely short-lived. Historically speaking, when the major market leaders lag in performance, the rest of the cryptocurrency ecosystem traditionally struggles to sustain any meaningful upside momentum. According to Alex Kuptsikevich, the chief market analyst at FxPro, this current market dynamic is deeply concerning. Kuptsikevich stated in an email that the decline of the largest coins serves as an “ominous sign” for smaller tokens, warning that the weakness in large caps could soon filter through and pull the smaller assets down at an accelerated pace. Therefore, while altcoin holders might currently feel insulated from Bitcoin’s recent drop, the historical precedent suggests that widespread market contagion remains a highly probable risk.

(Note: To provide additional context outside of the provided sources, it is a common phenomenon in cryptocurrency markets for profits from Bitcoin rallies to temporarily rotate into smaller altcoins, an event colloquially known as “alt-season.” However, when Bitcoin breaks critical macro support, liquidity is often rapidly drained from these smaller, riskier assets as investors flee to safety. I strongly encourage readers to independently verify broader market cycle theories.)

On-Chain Data Signals a Prolonged “Stress Phase”

Beyond the surface-level price charts, on-chain data provides a much deeper, more granular look into the psychological state of the crypto market. Analysts at CryptoQuant have closely examined the underlying blockchain metrics and concluded that the cryptocurrency market has officially entered a highly volatile “stress phase”. This classification suggests that network participants are currently experiencing elevated levels of anxiety and holding unrealized losses.

Crucially, these on-chain analysts note that despite the recent downward pressure, the market has not yet witnessed the type of heavy loss realization that typically characterizes a definitive cycle bottom. In cryptocurrency market cycles, a true bottom is often marked by a “capitulation” event—a moment of extreme panic where investors en masse sell their holdings at a significant loss, completely clearing out the weak hands. Because CryptoQuant’s data indicates that this definitive capitulation bottom is currently absent, it suggests to analysts that the current market unwind may not yet be completely finished. This lack of a clear capitulation bottom strongly implies that further downside volatility could still be on the horizon before a true, sustainable recovery can effectively begin.

Macroeconomic Headwinds: The Federal Reserve and Equities

Cryptocurrency does not exist in a vacuum, and recent macroeconomic developments are currently playing a massive role in suppressing Bitcoin’s overall price. A primary catalyst for the recent market weakness is the surprisingly hawkish tone revealed in recent Federal Reserve minutes. The minutes mentioned a possible interest rate hike, which immediately sent shockwaves through traditional and digital financial markets alike.

This hawkish macroeconomic stance had an immediate and direct impact on global currency markets, causing the U.S. dollar to notably strengthen. A stronger U.S. dollar traditionally puts immense downward pressure on risk assets, including both traditional equities and cryptocurrencies, as it makes dollar-denominated assets relatively more expensive and less attractive to hold. Consequently, as the Federal Reserve minutes were digested by investors, U.S. stocks began to aggressively lose their momentum. This bearish sentiment quickly bled into crypto-related equities, which sharply reversed their early daily gains. For instance, the prominent crypto exchange Coinbase experienced a dramatic intraday swing, moving from a 3% rise in the morning to a 2% loss, while Strategy similarly slipped by approximately 3%.

Interestingly, this U.S.-centric macroeconomic turbulence contrasted sharply with movements in the Asian markets. Outside the crypto sphere, Asian equities actually advanced during a period of thin Lunar New Year trading, with the MSCI Asia Pacific Index rising by 0.6%, largely led by robust gains in the Japanese market. Meanwhile, U.S. futures had only edged higher earlier in the period—after recent turbulence related to artificial intelligence cooled down—before the hawkish Fed minutes ultimately took their toll.

Shifting Institutional Tides: Examining Bitcoin ETF Outflows

Adding another thick layer of complexity to Bitcoin’s current market structure is the clear shifting of institutional fund flows. Following the highly anticipated launch of spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), market analysts have been keeping an incredibly close eye on how large, traditional institutional players are managing their crypto exposure.

Recent institutional data reveals that some major entities are opting to aggressively reduce their risk. Notably, Harvard University’s massive endowment made a significant move by cutting more than 20% of its Bitcoin ETF exposure during the fourth quarter. While this sizable reduction is a clear sign of institutional profit-taking or risk mitigation in the face of ongoing market uncertainty, it is also important for crypto investors to maintain perspective. Despite this substantial 20% cut, the Bitcoin ETF still remarkably remains the endowment fund’s absolute largest public cryptocurrency position. This specific data point indicates that while legacy institutions may be tactically adjusting their portfolios and taking some chips off the table, they have not entirely abandoned their long-term foundational thesis on the digital asset.

Technological Debates: Quantum Fears and Network Spam

As crypto traders rapidly weigh overarching macroeconomic and technical factors, the underlying Bitcoin network is also facing its own internal debates and perceived existential tech threats. Adding to the general unease in the broader market, the highly complex topic of quantum computing has recently resurfaced in active market conversations. Some cautious institutional investors are beginning to actively question the long-term cryptographic risks associated with quantum computers, fearing that future technological advancements could potentially break Bitcoin’s underlying security model. However, it is deeply worth noting that prominent blockchain software developers are actively pushing back against these fears, successfully arguing that the realistic timelines for any meaningful quantum threats are still placed decades away.

Simultaneously, a fierce ideological debate is currently raging within the elite Bitcoin development community regarding a highly controversial proposal known as BIP-110. This proposed technical update is specifically aimed at heavily reducing the amount of spam on the core Bitcoin network. However, Adam Back, the CEO of Blockstream and a legendary figure in the cryptocurrency space, has publicly and vehemently criticized the BIP-110 proposal. As noted by CoinDesk reporters, Back fundamentally argues that the update could inadvertently create entirely new reputational risks for the entire network by radically changing the established, decentralized rules regarding exactly what types of transactions should be allowed to be processed. These internal governance debates add an extra, unexpected layer of friction and uncertainty for everyday investors trying to gauge the long-term stability of the protocol.

Conclusion: Navigating the Warning Signs

In conclusion, Bitcoin losing the $70,000 level is not merely a minor technical blip; it is a profound warning sign that indicates the severe potential for further, significant downside. The largest cryptocurrency is currently trapped in a complex, interlocking web of bearish technical indicators, shifting institutional sentiment, and overwhelmingly hawkish macroeconomic forces. With the critical foundational support floor of $68,000 to $70,000 now fundamentally broken, and the asset aggressively testing the $66,000 range, the immediate risk is skewed heavily to the downside, with $65,000 and $60,000 looming ominously as the next major battlegrounds.

Furthermore, with on-chain data explicitly confirming a “stress phase” devoid of a true capitulation bottom, and hawkish Federal Reserve minutes strengthening the U.S. dollar to the absolute detriment of risk assets, crypto traders must exercise extreme caution. While smaller altcoins have shown temporary resilience, deep market history warns that a sustained drop in major market caps will almost certainly drag the broader crypto ecosystem down with it. As the community simultaneously wrestles with internal structural debates over network spam and long-term quantum computing risks, the path forward for Bitcoin remains fraught with unprecedented challenges. Investors should closely monitor the ongoing technical battle around the $67,000 to $70,000 marks, as the ultimate outcome of this struggle will likely dictate the broader macroeconomic trend for the weeks and potentially months to come

Why the Fed Sees Crypto Volatility as a Market Feature, Not a Banking Crisis

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher J. Waller has delivered a definitive message to the financial world regarding the tumultuous nature of cryptocurrency markets: the volatility is real, but the systemic threat to the banking sector is not. Speaking at a recent event hosted by the Global Interdependence Center, Waller offered a calm, pragmatic assessment of the digital asset landscape, downplaying fears that crypto crashes could trigger a domino effect within the traditional financial system.

At a time when digital assets are increasingly intersecting with mainstream portfolios, Waller’s comments provide a significant glimpse into how the central bank views the boundary between decentralized finance and the established economy. Rather than viewing crypto as an existential risk or a dangerous anomaly, Waller framed the market as an extension of everyday commerce—a separate ecosystem where high-stakes volatility is simply “part of the game” rather than a contagion waiting to infect Wall Street.

The “Detachment” Thesis

The core of Waller’s argument rests on the degree of separation between the crypto ecosystem and the traditional banking world. Despite the headlines generated by massive price swings, Waller emphasized that these fluctuations remain largely contained. He pushed back against the narrative that a crash in Bitcoin or other tokens poses an immediate danger to the stability of banks or the broader payments system.

“These things are pretty detached from the traditional finance world,” Waller explained. “You can have these big crashes and move volume. The rest of us wake up and we’re fine the next day. Nothing bad’s going on. The banks are open. Your payments are being made”.

This “detachment” thesis suggests that while crypto investors may suffer significant losses during downturns, the structural integrity of the economy remains untouched. Waller noted that he does not even closely monitor crypto markets as part of his day-to-day responsibilities at the Fed, further underscoring his view that the sector currently sits outside the “core” of the financial system.

Volatility as a Feature, Not a Bug

Waller addressed the notorious price swings of digital assets with a long-term perspective that dismisses immediate panic. He pointed out that the crypto market has established a cyclical character, where booms and busts are so routine they have earned their own terminology.

“Ups and downs in the crypto world have become so common they actually have a name for them: winters,” Waller said. “It’s part of the game”.

To illustrate his point, Waller contextualized recent price drops. While a decline to $63,000 for Bitcoin might trigger alarm bells for new investors, Waller reminded the audience of how far the asset has come. He noted that only eight years ago, a price of $10,000 would have been considered “crazy” high. By viewing these fluctuations through a longer lens, Waller suggested that what is often perceived as a crisis is merely a correction within a highly speculative market.

His advice to investors navigating this volatility was blunt and unequivocal: “Prices go up. Prices go down. If you don’t like it, don’t get in”.

Distinguishing the Tool from the Trade

A critical distinction in Waller’s analysis is the separation of the asset (the crypto token) from the technology (the blockchain). He compared a typical blockchain transaction to the mundane act of buying an apple at a grocery store. While the “rails” (the technology) and the “objects” (the assets) differ from traditional commerce, the basic structure of payment, execution, and recordkeeping remains the same.

“In the decentralized crypto world, a crypto asset, or digital asset, is the object that people want to buy,” Waller clarified. He described the underlying mechanisms—blockchains, tokenization, and smart contracts—as neutral tools rather than inherent threats.

“Those are just technologies,” Waller asserted. “There’s nothing dangerous about them. There’s nothing to be afraid of”.

This perspective effectively demystifies the technology, positioning it not as a shadowy force but as a new set of digital instruments that can be used for various purposes, including legitimate financial innovation.

The 24/7 Revolution and Legacy Systems

While dismissing the systemic risks of crypto assets, Waller acknowledged the potent influence of blockchain technology on financial infrastructure. He highlighted that traditional firms and even the U.S. Treasury are exploring tokenized securities, driven by the efficiency of blockchain systems.

The primary advantage of these new technologies, according to Waller, is their ability to operate globally around the clock. He contrasted this with “legacy systems” that are often bound by standard business hours and slower clearing cycles.

“These technologies were built to do this globally, 24 by seven from the beginning,” Waller noted. “They’re not legacy systems”.

This technological pressure is forcing traditional financial institutions to adapt. Waller argued that the existence of crypto rails is compelling big banks to upgrade their own payment systems to remain competitive, particularly regarding cross-border transfers. The competition from crypto is, in effect, driving the established players to make payments “faster and cheaper”.

The Regulatory Standoff

Despite the technological promise, Waller emphasized that the sector remains hampered by regulatory uncertainty. He pointed to the lack of clear definitions regarding whether specific tokens should be treated as securities or commodities—a determination that falls to Congress, the SEC, and the CFTC.

Waller expressed skepticism about the pace of legislative progress. “The bigger problem is clarity,” he said, noting that efforts in Congress appear to have stalled. “Everybody thought clarity would come in that would clear the road… It doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere anytime soon”.

He suggested that this legislative gridlock has cooled enthusiasm in the market, as expectations for a quick regulatory framework—a “clarity act”—have faded. Without these clear rules of the road, the integration of digital assets into the broader economy remains tentative, leaving the market in its current state of speculative volatility and detached “winters.”

Conclusion

Governor Waller’s comments paint a picture of a Federal Reserve that is watchful but not alarmed. By categorizing crypto volatility as a contained phenomenon and distinguishing the speculative assets from the useful underlying technology, Waller argues that the banking system is insulated from the “crypto winters.” While the technology forces necessary modernization upon legacy banks, the “big crashes” of the crypto world remain, for now, a game for those willing to play it—leaving the rest of the financial world to wake up the next day, business as usual

The Institutional Pivot: Goldman Sachs and the Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Bet

Introduction: A Major Disclosure Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs has officially cemented its status as a major player in the cryptocurrency space. According to recent financial holding disclosures, the investment bank has revealed a massive expansion of its digital asset holdings, reporting approximately $2.36 billion in total crypto exposure. The most significant portion of this portfolio is dedicated to Bitcoin, marking a decisive shift for a firm that had historically maintained a skeptical stance toward the asset class.

Breaking Down the Holdings The centerpiece of Goldman Sachs’ crypto strategy is its substantial investment in Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). The disclosures reveal a $1.1 billion position specifically in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). This single position represents the largest share of any digital asset listed in their holdings.

Beyond the headline-grabbing BlackRock investment, the bank’s Bitcoin exposure is diversified across several other vehicles and entities:

• Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund: The filings show holdings of approximately $35.8 million.

• Market Infrastructure and Mining: Goldman Sachs holds roughly $92,000 in American Bitcoin and approximately $57,000 in Bitcoin Depot, alongside investments in various other Bitcoin mining or cloud-based companies.

• Derivatives: The bank is not just holding spot ETFs; it is actively managing risk and exposure through derivatives, with filings indicating the firm holds hundreds of thousands in IBIT calls and puts.

Furthermore, Goldman’s crypto appetite extends beyond Bitcoin. Filings from the same period indicate that the bank also holds positions in other major cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, XRP, and Solana.

The Evolution of a Strategy This multi-billion dollar disclosure highlights how far Goldman Sachs has moved from its earlier public posture. For much of its history, the bank was “publicly circumspect” regarding cryptocurrencies, with executives often distancing the institution from Bitcoin as a viable investable asset class.

However, the path to the current portfolio began over five years ago with tentative steps.

• 2022 Milestones: The firm executed its first known Bitcoin-backed loan and a non-deliverable Bitcoin options trade. These moves were viewed as early strategic steps into the digital asset ecosystem.

• 2024 Acceleration: The posture shifted notably in 2024. SEC filings from this period revealed the bank’s first meaningful accumulation of Bitcoin ETFs. Within months, Goldman appeared to triple its Bitcoin ETF stake, bringing those specific holdings to roughly $1.5 billion and positioning itself as one of the largest institutional holders of Bitcoin ETFs.

Market Context: Volatility and Resistance Goldman Sachs’ deepening involvement comes during a period of complex price action for Bitcoin. The asset has recently struggled to maintain its footing above the psychologically significant $70,000 level.

Recent market behavior has been characterized by sharp volatility:

• The Selloff: Bitcoin experienced a sharp decline recently, breaking down through both the $70,000 and $60,000 ranges before finding support near $60,000.

• The Rebound: After capitulating at the $60,000 level, bulls managed a strong recovery, pushing the price back up to approximately $71,700 before closing the week near $70,315.

Despite this recovery, the sources indicate that overall sentiment remains bearish, with bears controlling much of the downside momentum.

Technical Outlook: Key Levels to Watch For investors watching Goldman’s massive bet play out, several technical indicators define the current market landscape.

• Resistance Levels: The immediate area to watch is 71,800∗∗,wherethepricewasrecentlyrejected.Abovethatliesthe0.382Fibonacciretracementlevelnear∗∗74,500. Stronger resistance is anticipated at 79,000∗∗and∗∗84,000.

• Support Levels: To sustain a reversal attempt, bulls must hold the price above 65,650∗∗and∗∗63,000. The 60,000∗∗levelisidentifiedascriticalsupport.Justbelowthissitsthe0.618retracementat∗∗57,800, which may represent the “true floor” for the asset.

Conclusion Goldman Sachs’ disclosure of $2.36 billion in crypto exposure—anchored by over $1 billion in BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF—represents a significant milestone in the institutional adoption of cryptocurrency. While the market grapples with bearish sentiment and critical technical resistance levels, the “venerable investment bank” has clearly signaled that digital assets are now a meaningful component of its portfolio strategy

The Identity Crisis: Why Bitcoin Trades Like Tech, Not Gold

Introduction: The Tech Trade Reality

For years, proponents of cryptocurrency have championed the narrative of “digital gold”—the idea that Bitcoin serves as a non-sovereign, scarce store of value that can hedge against traditional market volatility. However, recent market data suggests that this narrative is, for the moment, premature. According to a recent report by crypto asset manager Grayscale, Bitcoin is currently behaving less like a mature safe haven and more like a speculative technology play.

During the sell-off earlier this month, which saw Bitcoin slide to approximately $60,000, the asset did not behave in the way gold investors would recognize. Instead, the decline looked familiar to tech investors. As high-growth software stocks retreated, Bitcoin fell in “near lockstep,” reinforcing the perspective that the world’s largest cryptocurrency currently trades as an emerging technology rather than a stabilized store of value.

The Maturity Gap: 17 Years vs. Millennia

The core of the issue lies in the timeline of adoption and trust. Grayscale’s analysis highlights a fundamental distinction between the potential of Bitcoin and its current state. Bitcoin possesses the necessary design features to function as a long-term store of value: it has a capped supply, it operates independently of governments, and it runs on a resilient, decentralized network. These qualities theoretically position it to preserve purchasing power over time.

However, the asset is only 17 years old. When placed against the backdrop of gold’s history, which spans millennia, Bitcoin is still in the earliest stages of its monetary journey. As Zach Pandl, Grayscale’s head of research, noted, while the network is likely to operate well beyond our lifetimes and retain value in real terms, it has not yet achieved the historical gravitas required to act as a definitive shield against immediate market stress.

The Divergence: Safe Haven or Risk Asset?

The “digital gold” thesis has faced significant scrutiny in recent months due to a distinct divergence in asset performance. Theoretically, a safe haven asset should hold its value or appreciate during periods of market stress. Yet, recently, Bitcoin has done the opposite. Rather than offering protection, it has fallen sharply from its highs, moving in tandem with risk assets as investors shifted to defensive positions.

The contrast with physical gold is stark. At the exact moment Bitcoin was experiencing capital exits, physical gold surged to record levels, drawing significant inflows. This split has substantially weakened the argument that Bitcoin reliably holds value during moments of acute market stress. It suggests that mathematical scarcity alone is currently insufficient to force Bitcoin to behave like gold when investors prioritize protection over growth.

The Bet on Adoption

If Bitcoin is not yet digital gold, what is it? According to Pandl, investing in Bitcoin today is fundamentally a “bet on adoption”. Until the asset achieves widespread acceptance as a global monetary standard, its price action will remain tethered to global risk appetite.

This means that Bitcoin’s valuation rises and falls along with growth-oriented portfolios. When investors are bullish on the future of technology and expansion, Bitcoin thrives. When they retreat from risk, Bitcoin suffers. This dynamic explains why the asset acts as a high-beta tech stock rather than a counter-cyclical hedge.

Recent market mechanics validate this view. The selling pressure has been largely U.S.-led, characterized by a sharp deleveraging across crypto derivatives and outflows from spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). These signals are indicative of a “growth unwind”—investors reducing exposure to risky bets—rather than a crisis of confidence in the Bitcoin network itself.

Institutional Sentiment and ETF Flows

The cooling of institutional appetite is evident in the recent performance of spot Bitcoin ETFs. After an initial period of enthusiasm, U.S.-listed funds have logged a sustained run of outflows, shedding hundreds of millions of dollars. These withdrawals, driven by falling prices and market volatility, have dragged down the total assets under management for these products.

This trend underscores a softening in demand for ETF-based exposure. Many positions are now underwater, leading investors to pull back. However, while the ETF market experiences friction, the broader crypto ecosystem continues to see inflows elsewhere, suggesting that the hesitation is specific to the current price volatility rather than a complete abandonment of the asset class.

The Path Forward: Infrastructure and Innovation

Despite the current correlation with tech stocks, Grayscale sees the foundations for a recovery and eventual maturation. This outlook extends beyond short-term price action to the structural growth of the blockchain sector. Momentum is building around regulatory clarity for stablecoins and tokenized assets, alongside continued innovation in blockchain infrastructure.

The report highlights that platforms such as Ethereum and Solana, as well as middleware providers like Chainlink, stand to benefit from this next phase of adoption. As these technologies mature, they may provide the utility and stability required to transition the asset class from a speculative growth trade to a fundamental component of the financial system.

The Long-Term Horizon

Bitcoin’s ultimate test is still unfolding. For the asset to eventually mimic the behavior of gold, it must clear several significant technical and systemic hurdles. Questions regarding network scaling, transaction fees, and future resistance to quantum computing remain unresolved.

However, the Grayscale report argues that if Bitcoin can successfully navigate these challenges, its profile will evolve. Over time, its volatility is expected to fall, and its correlation with equities should fade. In this scenario, its behavior may eventually resemble that of gold, but with a “digital backbone”. Wall Street giants like JPMorgan have echoed this sentiment, noting that lower volatility relative to gold could eventually make Bitcoin “more attractive” in the long term.

Conclusion

For the time being, investors must recognize the duality of Bitcoin. While its code promises the stability of a digital commodity, its market reality is that of an emerging technology stock. It is a growth trade fueled by a bet on future adoption, prone to the same volatility as the software sector. While the path toward becoming “digital gold” is visible, the market data confirms that Bitcoin has not yet arrived at that destination.

Bernstein: This Is the ‘Weakest Bear Case’ in Bitcoin History—$150K Target Remains for 2026

Despite recent market volatility that has seen Bitcoin (BTC) trading slightly below the $70,000 mark, research and brokerage firm Bernstein has issued a fiercely bullish update. In a report released on February 9, 2026, analysts characterized the current market downturn as the “weakest bear case” in the asset’s history and reaffirmed their ambitious price target of $150,000 by the end of the year.

For investors concerned about the recent drawdown, Bernstein’s message is clear: this is a crisis of confidence, not a structural failure.

A “Weak” Bear Market: No Systemic Failures

Bernstein’s latest analysis distinguishes the current market environment from the brutal “crypto winters” of the past. According to the firm, previous bear markets were precipitated by tangible catastrophes—major corporate failures, the unraveling of hidden leverage, or systemic breakdowns within the crypto ecosystem.

In stark contrast, the analysts note that the current cycle lacks these negative catalysts. “What we are experiencing is the weakest bitcoin bear case in its history,” the analysts wrote. They argue that there have been no comparable blowups or widespread insolvencies to justify a prolonged bearish outlook. instead, the market is suffering from sentiment weakness rather than any fundamental flaw in the Bitcoin network or its investment thesis.

Institutional Alignment and the “Pro-Bitcoin” Environment

A key pillar of Bernstein’s bullish thesis is the unprecedented level of institutional alignment supporting the asset class. Unlike previous cycles where Bitcoin faced regulatory headwinds or institutional skepticism, the current landscape is defined by deep integration with traditional finance.

The analysts highlighted several factors bolstering this view:

• A favorable political climate: The report cites a “pro-bitcoin U.S. political environment” as a stabilizing force.

• ETF Adoption: The continued expansion and adoption of spot BTC ETFs provide a regulated on-ramp for capital.

• Corporate Participation: There is rising participation from corporate treasuries and continued involvement from large asset managers.

Bernstein argues that the broader story of Bitcoin adoption remains completely intact, despite the temporary price action.

Bitcoin vs. Gold: Understanding the Liquidity Dynamic

Critics have recently pointed out that Bitcoin has lagged behind gold during this period of macroeconomic volatility. Bernstein addressed this divergence directly, clarifying that Bitcoin currently behaves primarily as a “liquidity-sensitive risk asset” rather than a mature safe haven like gold.

The report notes that elevated interest rates and tighter financial conditions have funneled gains into specific sectors, such as precious metals and AI-linked equities. However, Bernstein remains confident that the infrastructure is in place—specifically through BTC ETFs and corporate capital-raising channels—to absorb renewed liquidity as soon as macroeconomic conditions ease.

The AI Economy: Bitcoin’s Role in an “Agentic” Future

Beyond price targets, Bernstein pushed back against the narrative that Bitcoin is losing relevance in an economy increasingly dominated by Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Far from being obsolete, Bernstein posits that blockchains and programmable wallets are essential for an emerging “agentic” digital environment. As autonomous software agents become more prevalent, they will require global, machine-readable financial rails to operate. The analysts argue that traditional banking systems, with their closed APIs and legacy barriers, are ill-equipped to serve this need, leaving Bitcoin to play a central role.

Dismissing the “FUD”: Quantum Computing and Miner Capitulation

The report also tackled persistent fears regarding quantum computing and corporate leverage, labeling much of the concern as “FUD” (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt).

1. The Quantum Threat Bernstein acknowledged that while future cryptographic threats are real, Bitcoin is not uniquely exposed. “All critical digital systems face similar risks and will transition toward quantum-resistant standards together,” the firm argued.

This sentiment was echoed by Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of Strategy (MicroStrategy), during the company’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings call. Saylor announced a “Bitcoin Security Program” to coordinate defense with the broader cyber community, framing quantum computing as a future engineering challenge rather than an immediate existential threat. He emphasized that any necessary upgrades to the Bitcoin protocol would be achieved through global consensus, a process consistent with Bitcoin’s history of adapting to technical pressure.

2. Corporate Leverage and Miner Health Bernstein also dismissed concerns that leveraged corporate holders or miners might capitulate, driving prices lower. The analysts observed that major Bitcoin-holding firms have structured their liabilities to withstand significant volatility.

Citing data from Strategy (MicroStrategy), the analysts noted that the company’s balance sheet would only require restructuring in an extreme scenario—specifically, if Bitcoin were to fall to $8,000 and remain there for five years. With Bitcoin trading near $70,000, the market is far removed from such distress levels.

The Road to $150,000

Ultimately, Bernstein sees the current selloff as a temporary sentiment dip in a structurally sound market. With no hidden leverage bubbles bursting and a clear path for institutional adoption, the firm remains steadfast in its prediction.

The analysts concluded by reiterating their forecast: Bitcoin is on track to reach $150,000 by the end of 2026.

——————————————————————————–

Disclaimer: This article is based on analyst reports and historical data as of February 2026. It does not constitute financial advice. Digital assets are highly volatile; investors should conduct their own due diligence.